Wednesday, 1 July 2015

HARROW TIMES AND THEIR ROLE IN PROMOTING IS TERROR


UK HARROW TIMES – AN AMERICAN COMPANY- ASSISTING ISIS
Introduction:
A research team at Sonoma State University has recently finished conducting a network analysis of the boards of directors of the ten big media organizations in the US. The team determined that only 118 people comprise the membership on the boards of director of the ten big media giants. This is a small enough group to fit in a moderate size university classroom. These 118 individuals in turn sit on the corporate boards of 288 national and international corporations. In fact, eight out of ten big media giants share common memberships on boards of directors with each other. NBC and the Washington Post both have board members who sit on Coca Cola and J. P. Morgan, while the Tribune Company, The New York Times and Gannett all have members who share a seat on Pepsi. It is kind of like one big happy family of interlocks and shared interests. The following are but a few of the corporate board interlocks for the big ten media giants in the US:
New York Times: Caryle Group, Eli Lilly, Ford, Johnson and Johnson, Hallmark,
Lehman Brothers, Staples, Pepsi
Washington Post: Lockheed Martin, Coca-Cola, Dun & Bradstreet, Gillette,
G.E. Investments, J.P. Morgan, Moody’s
Knight-Ridder: Adobe Systems, Echelon, H&R Block, Kimberly-Clark, Starwood Hotels
The Tribune (Chicago & LA Times): 3M, Allstate, Caterpillar, Conoco Phillips, Kraft,
McDonalds, Pepsi, Quaker Oats, Shering Plough, Wells Fargo
News Corp (Fox): British Airways, Rothschild Investments
GE (NBC): Anheuser-Busch, Avon, Bechtel, Chevron/Texaco, Coca-Cola, Dell, GM,
Home Depot, Kellogg, J.P. Morgan, Microsoft, Motorola, Procter & Gamble,
Disney (ABC): Boeing, Northwest Airlines, Clorox, Estee Lauder, FedEx, Gillette,
Halliburton, Kmart, McKesson, Staples, Yahoo,
Viacom (CBS): American Express, Consolidated Edison, Oracle, Lafarge North America
Gannett: AP, Lockheed-Martin, Continental Airlines, Goldman Sachs, Prudential, Target,
Pepsi,
AOL-Time Warner (CNN): Citigroup, Estee Lauder, Colgate-Palmolive, Hilton
Can we trust the news editors at the Washington Post to be fair and objective regarding news stories about Lockheed-Martin defense contract over-runs? Or can we assuredly believe that ABC will conduct critical investigative reporting on Halliburton’s sole-source contracts in Iraq? If we believe the corporate media give us the full un-censored truth about key issues inside the special interests of American capitalism, then we might feel that they are meeting the democratic needs of mainstream America. However if we believe — as increasingly more Americans do— that corporate media serves its own self-interests instead of those of the people, than we can no longer call it mainstream or refer to it as plural. Instead we need to say that corporate media is corporate America, and that we the mainstream people need to be looking at alternative independent sources for our news and information


Harrow Times is owned by proxy by the Gannett foundation. An american corporate giant that issues media policy through its disciples. Is it then a giant conspiracy? Who knows…but the truth is… this ginat corporation can influence alongside other corporate giants how we live…what we do…and how we think. The secular media wants to create an enemy for people to hate… if its not the commies or the nazis… its IS – or born again Christian evangelists.. whatever and who ever… just as long as you keep people divided…you will rule…
But in recent times we have seen the rise of an Islamic caliphate which does threaten all Western civilisation… and guess what… they are getting their new recruits by using the very hate proganda that tabloid newspapers spew out against Christians… or any what is regarded as extremist religious group or individuals by the secularist elite.
The law states:
RACE AND RELIGIOUS HATRED ACT 2006.
“Part 3A E+WHatred against persons on religious grounds
29AMeaning of “religious hatred”
In this Part “religious hatred” means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief.
29CPublishing or distributing written material
(1)A person who publishes or distributes written material which is threatening is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.
(2)References in this Part to the publication or distribution of written material are to its publication or distribution to the public or a section of the public.
29MOffences by corporations
(1)Where a body corporate is guilty of an offence under this Part and it is shown that the offence was committed with the consent or connivance of a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body, or a person purporting to act in any such capacity, he as well as the body corporate is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
(2)Where the affairs of a body corporate are managed by its members, subsection (1) applies in relation to the acts and defaults of a member in connection with his functions of management as it applies to a director.

 In the 2005 General Election the Labour Party included the following in its  Manifesto for England and its Manifesto for Wales (though not the Manifesto for Scotland)

"It remains our firm and clear intention to give people of all faiths the same protection against incitement to hatred on the basis of their religion. We will legislate to outlaw it and will continue the dialogue we have started with faith groups from all backgrounds about how best to balance protection, tolerance and free speech."

http://religionlaw.co.uk/crimescc.htm

 
The Criminal Offence of Incitement to Religious Hatred� in England and Wales came into force on 1st October 2007 in the form of the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006.  This Act was passed after considerable debate and controversy and is significantly different to the Governments original proposals. 

The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (c. 1) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which creates an offence in England and Wales of inciting hatred against a person on the grounds of their religion.
The Act was the Labour Government's third attempt to bring in this offence: provisions were originally included as part of the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill in 2001, but were dropped after objections from the House of Lords. The measure was again brought forward as part of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill in 2004-5, but was again dropped in order to get the body of that Bill passed before the 2005 general election.
The Act is notable because two amendments made in the House of Lords failed to be overturned by the Government in the House of Commons.
Most of the Act came into force on 1 October 2007.
The CPS defines it as :
We define a religious incident as:
"Any incident which is believed to be motivated because of a person's religion or perceived religion, by the victim or any other person".


Why do British muslims commit acts of terror?
1.In 2006, Britain's then head of MI5 Eliza Manningham-Buller said of Al-Qaeda that it "has developed an ideology which claims that Islam is under attack, and needs to be defended". "This" she said "is a powerful narrative that weaves together conflicts from across the globe, presenting the West’s response to varied and complex issues, from long-standing disputes such as Israel/Palestine and Kashmir to more recent events as evidence of an across-the-board determination to undermine and humiliate Islam worldwide."[70] She said that the video wills of British suicide bombers made it clear that they were motivated by perceived worldwide and long-standing injustices against Muslims; an extreme and minority interpretation of Islam promoted by some preachers and people of influence; their interpretation as anti-Muslim of UK foreign policy, in particular the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.”
2. One ideology that plays a role in Islamic terrorism is the principle of Jihad, which broadly means strive. Militants generally use jihad to mean defensive or, at a stretch, retaliatory warfare against actors that have allegedly harmed Muslims.
Transnational Islamist ideology, specifically of the militant Islamists, assert that Western policies and society are actively anti-Islamic, or as it is sometimes described, waging a "war against Islam".
Islamists often identify what they see as a historical struggle between Christianity and Islam, dating back as far as the Crusades, among other historical conflicts between practitioners of the two respective religions.
Osama bin Laden, for example, almost invariably described his enemy as aggressive and his call for action against them as defensive. Defensive jihad differs from offensive jihad in being "fard al-ayn," or a personal obligation of all Muslims, rather than "fard al-kifaya", a communal obligation, that is, some Muslims may perform it but it is not required from others. Hence, framing a fight as defensive has the advantage of both appearing to be a victim rather than an aggressor, and of giving the struggle the very highest religious priority for all good Muslims.
3. Evangelisation of muslims. This is regarded as a crime under sharia law…and those who evangelise muslims are another reason why it is important to wage jihad aginst the west. Those who practise the converting of muslims are to be hated.
“Apostasy, the conscious abandonment of Islam by a Muslim in word or through deed, including also conversion to Christianity, is punishable as a crime under the application of the Sharia. There are, however, cases in which a Muslim will adopt the Christian faith, secretly without declaring his/her apostasy. As a result, they are practising Christians, but legally Muslims.
“God willing this generation will fight infidels and apostates..and God williung the right doctirne has been implanted into these children”
In short – there are what is known as “ missionaries” within society who act as sleeper agents. These agents have differnet roles but the same job.. to show the west as a corrupt – immoral society who simply wish either to convert believers ( muslims ) or subjugate them under their permissive ways. Any one who is viewed as somone who is converting muslims to another faith is especially seen as the enemy of islam… and if secular media reports publish things like “ the bible told him to rape” … this INCITE hate towards chrisitans and can be used by these islamic agents to show the way of the infidel is disgrace whereas the way of the believer is to paradise.. This material that is being published in the western media only wishes to stir up trouble…and sell newspaper… if christians and muslims are fighting..it’s a good thing. So they publish and be damned.
4.ISIS now operates the most sophisticate propaganda machine of any terrorist organization, said Matthew Olsen, director of the National Counter terrorism Center.
"Importantly, the group also views itself as the now-leader of a global jihadist movement," Olsen said. "It turns out timely, high-quality media, and it uses social media to secure a widespread following."
What do Muslims say about how this poiusonous ideology esposed by IS to recruit new people is? – an ideology that comes from HATE… ( hate that is promoted by the secular press against Christian
IS is a heretical, extremist organization and it is religiously prohibited (haram) to support or join it; furthermore, it is an obligation on British Muslims to actively oppose its poisonous ideology, especially when this is promoted within Britain
What does the PM say ?
He added: "Adhering to British values is not an option or a choice. It is a duty for all those who live in these islands so we will stand up for our values, we will in the end defeat this extremism and we will secure our way of life for generations to come."
What does Theresa May – the home secretary say?
Time and again we are seeing what we are now up against: the powerful allure of propaganda pumped out by ISIL and others to recruit and brainwash British men and women, the access social media and modern communications give terrorists to vulnerable people, and the desire of those terrorists to poison others against our values and our way of life.
But if we are to dissuade those wanting to travel to dangerous lands… if we are to stop those hoping to train and fight for a terrorist cause…if we are to protect the vulnerable who might be at risk of radicalisation……. then the Government and law enforcement cannot work alone. The threat has changed, and we are facing a pernicious new phenomenon, which is reaching out to people around the world and calling them to join their twisted cause. If we are to defeat this threat, if we are to confront this, and terrorism and extremism of all kinds, then we must work together. ISIL might seem a remote and distant organisation, but the fight against its evil influence must take place here in our towns and cities, in our communities, and in our homes.
Conclusions:
  1. The government realise that IS is reaching vulnerable people HERE in the UK through social media and other online vehicles. That they recruit people through this poison propaganda.
  2. The jihad or holy war against the West is not just against ifedels… - unbelivers and their corrupt morality…it is against apostates..those who convert muslims to other religions.
  3. The slick machine of the Islamic extremists use the secular press to justify their own arguments of a deporaved society. They USE articles that agree with them to issue this logic in the minds of the potential recruit…
  4. This propoganda has two levels. Hard – graphic ( beheading videos etc) and Soft – sublimal ( resulting in the perspective that … you are being discriminated against because you are a muslim.


What is the differnece between “ hard “and “soft “ propganda?
The way an article is used on lites like loonwatch- and in particular
is to show discrimination and superiority of and against Muslims by mainstream society – Jews – Chritians and others.
In particular it shows the fruits of and the end of apostates and those who try to evangelise or convert Muslims. This can use black humor or press cuttings from the secular press which always sexualise articles to stir up divisions and emoptional triggers within those comunities.. to sell copy.
I have asked those who have done so to remove the links on their websites which used my story as a means to promote islamic extremist ideology. In 2012 I was released from prison and I managed to remove 90% - of the offensive articles. Recently in 2014 I conatcted Mohammed Abbasi OF THE British Muslim council WHO ALSO AGREED THAT IT DOES INCITE RELIGIOUS HATRED AND FULE THE FIRE. He removed his articles on me from his site.
It is only the Harrow Times and Northampton Chronicle who have refused to remove this offensive article. Since then this article has been used by militant Native American Indians.
Again to incite religious intolerance. I did take action by contacting googel and they have removed some of the links but not all- I don’t undertand why…
The offensive articles :
Here is the language they use: remember this article was published in 2010- before ISIS…
AND IT IS BEING USED TODAY…BY ISIS…
A "REMORSELESS" Wembley preacher who raped a woman on seven consecutive days was jailed on Friday
Specifically it says the word preacher which is incorrect. I never was a preacher. He couches the language to show religious significance such as remorseless- all calculated to “ trigger2 those who read it.
Then it uses another word to incite religious hate- describing me as an extremist. …
“religious fanatic”
and then is the crunch line… he did these criminal acts because… the bible told him so…
She told the court Denton believed women should be submissive “because the scripture says so”.
Again… nowhere in the trial transcript was this said….all he did here was transliterate it. In other words misquote.
Even after the convictions were overturned the hateful secular press use the words “ preacher2 to incite hatred towards Chritians- even though his name was cleared.
Preacher released after rape conviction overturned - see related link.
All of these statements amount to religious racism and theophobia- the viewpoint of the secular press is to denigrate anyone who manifests their faith. To put them down.
By printing such half truths and lies all that is ahappening is that muslim propagandists have more fuel to build a soft argument for hating Christians who pronounce their faith.
In another article of the Northmapton Chronicle – it goes even further… it calls me a messiah… -I later used this in a play to satirise their stupidity.
ALL THESE ARTICLES ARE USED BY MILITANT EXTREMISTS TO SHOW UP THE CHRISITAN RELIGION AND ITS ADHERENTS AS CORRUPT AND IMMORAL – AND THE SPIRITUALITY AS DANGEROUS AND WRONG. AND THOSE THAT WRITE IT ARE FOMENTING THIS TERRORIST ACTIVITY KNOWINGLY. THIS IS NOT ABOUT FREEDOM OF SPEECH. THIS IS ABOUT PITTING ONE IDEOLOGY AGAINST ANOTHER. POLARISATION. AND THE RESULT IS …ISIS!
“ A PREACHER who described himself as the Messiah and raped a young woman on seven consecutive nights faces years behind bars.”
Finally, these articles were transposed from the court reporter – in other words the reporter who wrote it got it from the newssite. Then they put in their own slant… inciting hatred … in normal times these articles would be forgotten … but with electronic media they stay there forever.
My personal Life
Under the Human Rights article 8 I have a right to a family life…I also have a right to a private life under art 10. The fact is that these articles were not removed – despite the court news agency removing the orginal article on my request in 2012… and the reason it wasn’t removed –was beause the editors concerned wanted to do persoanl damge to my private life… not protect society.
I followed the legal process and I was cleared of my convictions. Only 4 5 of all appeals are succeful because you must have strong evidence for this.
The 3 judges looked at the whole case in its entirety and some of the ridiculous things that were said…and relaised this was all about charatcer assination…. Not evidence. Hearsay… and not truth. The legal process was adherred to by me to the letter… I have since filed a case aginst the Ministry of Justice for a Malicious Prosecution.
But that hasn’t helped me rebuild my life. This artiocle has impended my life in many social and economicla activites. People just look at the word “ rape “ and they recoil…even though the only perosn that was truly raped …was ME!
Whats more I have children –3 children that share my surname…who have been bullied at school by their association to me.
It doesn’t matter that these newspapers are a law unto themselves… but if it comes to free speech..then it must also come to responsibility in that free speech that doesn’t hurt, offend or insult a religious belief to such a degree that it can be used as ammunition to degrade the core values of ones religion and society.
And I havnt mentioned those Christian believers who look at the faith in their every day lives and want to hope in something beyond the state … beyond this life… and if this article is perceived by these same chritians as further evidence that the chritian faith itself is corrupt and immoral we have less who truly believe in anything… and that is bad for morality overall.
Especially if this article is not true.
OFFENSIVE. INSULTING. DEGRADING. INCITEFUL.
It is one thing to commit an act of criminality that has the element of relgion in it. But when this is not proven you encourage others to hate you and your faith. History in Europe is full of these examples. One such example is the inquisition against the Cathars.
When language is couched to incite hate towards muslims or jews or christians by atheists or anyone else… it has only the aim of getting the reader to further hate relgion altogether.
And this is what these two articles have done.
As I've said before, Ive had the majority – 95% of all the articles removed… in fact the last one was from the West london press… Here is what the editor said:
Dear Mr Denton,

Thanks for your email.

Are you able to supply me with details of when your convictions were quashed at the Royal Courts of Justice? A date, the judge who presided over the hearing, and a case number would be very helpful.
If I can confirm that this is the case then I would be happy to remove the story from our website as it would no longer be accurate.

Kind regards,

Amy

--
Amy De-Keyzer
Online editor

Get West London
Trinity Mirror Southern
Tel: 01483 508904/07822 862591
www.getwestlondon.co.uk

Follow me on Twitter: @Getwestlondon

Find me on Facebook: www.facebook.com/




THIS IS WHAT SHE DECIDED:
Hi Paul,

I've taken a look at the letter and at the BBC article and have taken the decision to remove the story from our website.
It has now been deleted and unpublished. This means it will no longer appear on Get West London.
You will need to speak directly to Google to get them the update the Google search for your name.

Kins regards,

Amy

Here is what Mohammed Abbasi A MODERATE Musilm- and a public figure in the Islamic community in Britain – after he had read about my ordeal...
HERE IS IN PART SOME OF OUR INTERACTION:
Mohammed Abbasi
Hi paul, saw your message on my blog a few days ago - apologies I did not check it before, I am going to delete that blog piece as I BELIEVE YOU also do you have any lawyers who are fighting for a retrial or something similar?
Real Paul Denton
Thank u. I apologise if I was offensive towards u. I do hv a face book page called the true paul robin denton story. I had all my convictions quashed on the 26th Jan. 2012. I've had only one newspaper who refused to delete their story. Harrow times so I went to Google and they deleted most of the links under the right to privacy. I am in turkey at the moment writing a book about my ordeal but I shall be coming to UK soon.






Mohammed Abbasi
Thanks for that Paul, the post is now deleted - I mentioned your case (didn't give your name) to a friend and he sent me this link http://www.falselyaccused.co.uk/
Real Paul Denton
Thank u friend.there is nothing more hurtful to a man than being lied about.I lost my family..my freedom..and nearly my faith.but in the end I learned to live again from a Muslim.life is a gift.
And we choose each day to live it
Mohammed Abbasi
Agreed, keep strong and know that God/Allah/Creator gives us the chance to strengthen through various trials and this is a trial from which you will grow stronger
Real Paul Denton
Thank asalaam.








POLICE ACTION:
Since this is an ongoing problem trying to live my life free of persecution; I decided that the only way I could get any justice against the Harrow Times and the Northampton Chronicle was to make a formal police complaint... undr the INCITEMENT TO RELIGIOUS HATRED ACT 2006.
I dont expect the counter terorism people to do much about it because they dont take these things very seriously – despite everything they say on TV about reporting any terrorist activity or defeating the poisonous ideology of terror. Its all bluster. They All support the corporations anyway. Its all one big club.
But I have made this complaint anyway...and we shall see if anything comes of it.
On the 30th June , 2015 I made a formal complaint to the TWICKENHAM police station.
I registered this complaint with SARAH EYLES , PAO.
All of this hassle – why? Because one person decided to lie to get her way.
And these lies have taken years to be cleaned with the truth...but as NERO once said...” make sure you tell them a fantatsic lie not just any lie...and they will believe you!”- and this is the problem I am facing... a press machine that wishes to spread lies and hate to furhter their own politcal agendas.
A press who are not accountable for their actions.
A press that persist in diving communities so as to sell more misery to the masses.
Apress that has lost its repsonsibility towards true journalism- to report the facts and to do it in a fair and a just manner.


I thank you


Paul Robin Denton
tel 0044 74 23714 007











Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)